From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 5, 2016
No. 14-03106-11-CR-S-MDH (W.D. Mo. Dec. 5, 2016)

Opinion

No. 14-03106-11-CR-S-MDH

12-05-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DONETTE C. DAVIS, Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P., 22(k)(26), WDMO, and 28 U.S.C. §636, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count One and admitted to the Forfeiture Allegation Six of the Second Superseding Indictment filed on July 22, 2015. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary, and that the offense charged is supported by a factual basis for each of the essential elements of the offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted and that the Defendant be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly. Date: December 5, 2016

/s/ David P. Rush

DAVID P. RUSH

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within 14 days from the date of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B).


Summaries of

United States v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 5, 2016
No. 14-03106-11-CR-S-MDH (W.D. Mo. Dec. 5, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DONETTE C. DAVIS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 5, 2016

Citations

No. 14-03106-11-CR-S-MDH (W.D. Mo. Dec. 5, 2016)