From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Davidson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 22, 2013
CASE NO. 1:12-CR-00168 AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:12-CR-00168 AWI-BAM

03-22-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SHIRLEY KAY DAVIDSON and JAMES GIULIO DAVIDSON, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney GRANT B. RABENN Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the United States of America


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
GRANT B. RABENN
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for the
United States of America

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE AND

SCHEDULE TRIAL DATE, TO VACATE AND

CONTINUE TRIAL CONFIRMATION HEARING,

AND TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

FROM MARCH 25, 2013 TO JULY 22, 2013.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsels, Grant B. Rabenn, counsel for the United States, and Carolyn D. Phillips, counsel for the defendant Shirley Kay Davidson, and James R. Homola, counsel for the defendant James Giulio Davidson, that the trial in the above-captioned matter now set for May 29, 2013 shall be vacated and rescheduled for December 10, 2013.

FURTHER, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the trial confirmation hearing presently scheduled for May 6, 2013 will be vacated and rescheduled to December 2, 2013.

FURTHER, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the status conference presently scheduled for March 25, 2013 will be vacated and rescheduled to July 22, 2013 at 1:00 p.m.

FURTHER, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the above parties that time shall be excluded from the status conference date of May 25, 2013 through the new status conference date of July 22, 2013 based on the need for defense counsel to consult with the defendants, review current charges, conduct investigation, review discovery and otherwise prepare for trial. Accordingly, the above parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendants in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161, et. seq.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

________________________

GRANT B. RABENN

Assistant United States Attorney

________________________

CAROLYN D. PHILLIPS

Attorney for Defendant Shirley Davidson

________________________

JAMES R. HOMOLA

Attorney for Defendant James Davidson

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial in the above-captioned matter now set for May 29, 2013, shall be vacated and rescheduled for December 10, 2013.

FURTHER, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial confirmation hearing presently scheduled for May 6, 2013 will be vacated and rescheduled to December 2, 2013.

FURTHER, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the status conference presently scheduled for March 25, 2013 will be vacated and rescheduled to July 22, 2013 at 1:00 p.m.

FURTHER, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that time shall be excluded from the status conference date of March 25, 2013 through the new status conference date of July 22, 2013 based on the need for defense counsel to consult with the defendant, review current charges, conduct investigation, review discovery and otherwise prepare for trial, and thus the ends of justice served by continuing the case outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161, et. seq. IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Davidson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 22, 2013
CASE NO. 1:12-CR-00168 AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Davidson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SHIRLEY KAY DAVIDSON and JAMES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 22, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:12-CR-00168 AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2013)