From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Dahir

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Mar 14, 2012
3:10-CR-00260(7) (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 14, 2012)

Opinion

3:10-CR-00260(7)

03-14-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HASSAN AHMED DAHIR (7)

PATRICK T. MCNALLY, BPR No. 010046 Attorney for Hassan Ahmed Dahir (7)


CHIEF JUDGE

DEFENDANT HASSAN AHMED DAHIR'S MOTION TO JOIN DEFENDANT

ANDREW KAYACHITH'S RESPONSE TO GOVERNMENT'S MOTION IN LIMINE,

MOTION TO INTRODUCE F.R.E. 412 EVIDENCE, AND MOTION TO CLARIFY

ORDER

Comes now, Hassan Ahmed Dahir, by and through the undersigned counsel, and moves the Honorable Court to join in Defendant Andrew Kayachith's Response to Government's Motion in Limine (Docket Entry no. 1796); Andrew Kayachith's Motion to Introduce F.R.E. 412 Evidence (Docket Entry no. 1997); and Andrew Kayachith's Motion to Clarify Order (Docket Entry no. 1957). The two pleadings and the Order all pertain to the issue of admissibility of Rule 412 evidence concerning Jane Doe Two.

Respectfully submitted,

WEATHERLY, MCNALLY & DIXON, PLC

PATRICK T. MCNALLY, BPR No. 010046

Attorney for Hassan Ahmed Dahir (7)


Summaries of

United States v. Dahir

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Mar 14, 2012
3:10-CR-00260(7) (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 14, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Dahir

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HASSAN AHMED DAHIR (7)

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 14, 2012

Citations

3:10-CR-00260(7) (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 14, 2012)