From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Curry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION
Dec 21, 2012
No. 1:00-00002 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 21, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1:00-00002

12-21-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBERT MICHAEL CURRY


JUDGE CAMPBELL


ORDER SUBSTITUTING RESTITUTION RECIPIENT

Judgment was entered as to the above-named defendant, Robert Michael Curry, on June 6, 2000 (Docket Entry No. 21), wherein restitution in the amount of $267,657.67 was ordered to be paid to AmSouth Bank and $298,462.88 was ordered to be paid to Union Planters Bank. Based upon information provided by the Clerk's Office, it appears that AmSouth Bank and Union Planters Bank were acquired by Regions Bank.

Accordingly, the aforementioned Judgment in this case is hereby amended to reflect that the name of the restitution recipient is Regions Bank. The restitution balance of $261,056.50 (AmSouth) and $291,114.43 (Union Planters), totaling $552,170.93, shall be paid to Regions Bank.

The Court's authority to substitute the victim's name in the judgment is drawn from the All Writs Act (28 U.S.C. §1651 (a)), which expressly authorizes a federal court to issue such orders "as may be necessary or appropriate to effectuate and prevent the frustration of orders it has previously issued in its exercise of jurisdiction otherwise obtained."

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

TODD J. CAMPBELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Curry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION
Dec 21, 2012
No. 1:00-00002 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 21, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Curry

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBERT MICHAEL CURRY

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION

Date published: Dec 21, 2012

Citations

No. 1:00-00002 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 21, 2012)