From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cuellar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2013
No. 1:10-CR-00285 LJO-4 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1:10-CR-00285 LJO-4

01-23-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH CUELLAR, et al, Defendants.

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER Acting Federal Defender JEREMY S. KROGER FRANCINE ZEPEDA Assistant Federal Defenders Attorneys for Defendant Rudolph Buendia, III BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney SAMUEL WONG Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff DOUGLAS C. FOSTER Ciummo and Associates Attorney for Defendant Joseph Cuellar CADEE PETERS Cadee Peters Law Offices Attorney for Defendant Patrick Bowman


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692
Acting Federal Defender
FRANCINE ZEPEDA, Bar #91175
JEREMY KROGER, Bar # 258956
Assistant Federal Defender
Designated Counsel for Service
2300 Tulare Street, Suite 330
Fresno, California 93721-2226
Telephone: (559) 487-5561
Attorneys for Defendant
RUDOLPH BUENDIA, III

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE FOR

FILING MOTIONS IN LIMINE; ORDER


Motion Hearing: February 25, 2013

Trial Date: March 19, 2013

Dept: 4

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel that motions in limine in the above-captioned matter now due on January 25, 2013, may be filed on or before February 1, 2013, with all other dates and deadlines to remain the same.

The government has recently extended plea offers to all defendants in this case. In order to permit defendants to fully discuss those offers with their respective attorneys prior to the filing of motions in limine, the parties request this one-week additional extension to the motion in limine deadline. This request will not affect any other deadlines in this case.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice, including but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B).

Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Defender

______________________

JEREMY S. KROGER

FRANCINE ZEPEDA

Assistant Federal Defenders

Attorneys for Defendant

Rudolph Buendia, III

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

______________________

SAMUEL WONG

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for Plaintiff

______________________

DOUGLAS C. FOSTER

Ciummo and Associates

Attorney for Defendant

Joseph Cuellar

______________________

CADEE PETERS

Cadee Peters Law Offices

Attorney for Defendant

Patrick Bowman

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. For the reasons set forth above, the continuance requested is granted for good cause and the Court finds the interest of justice outweighs the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Cuellar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2013
No. 1:10-CR-00285 LJO-4 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Cuellar

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH CUELLAR, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 23, 2013

Citations

No. 1:10-CR-00285 LJO-4 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2013)