From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Crusoe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 11, 2013
Case No. 3:06cr157 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06cr157

12-11-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DARYL ANTHONY CRUSOE, Defendant.


JUDGE WALTER H. RICE

ENTRY FINDING DEFENDANT IN VIOLATION OF SUPERVISED

RELEASE, BUT DEFERRING A DECISION AS TO FINAL DISPOSITION;

FINAL HEARING ON SUPERVISED RELEASE VIOLATION SET FOR

JANUARY 13, 2014, AT 2:00 P.M.; INTERIM STEPS OUTLINED

On November 27, 2013, the Defendant, having previously been found in violation of his supervised release that began September 28, 2011, appeared in open Court for interim disposition.

Pursuant to the record made on the aforesaid November 27, 2013, the Court deferred decision on final resolution of the supervised release violation, opting instead to set a final disposition date for January 13, 2014, at 2:00 p.m., upon the specific conditions that Defendant comply with any and all other requirements of supervised release, presently undischarged, and, further, that he abide by all five provisions of the attached Supervision Plan approved by this Court on November 27, 2013, and agreed to by the Defendant and signed by him in open Court.

_____________

WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to: Counsel of record
Kristin Keyer, U.S. Probation Officer
Greg Freson, U.S. Probation Officer

Daryl Crusoe

DOCKET NO. 3:00-CR-019

SUPERVISION PLAN 1. Mr. Crusoe will not have any contact with Kathleen Staten during the remainder of his term of supervision unless authorized by the Probation Officer or the Court. 2. Mr. Crusoe will obtain verifiable employment as soon as possible upon release. He will seek employment through The Job Center with the assistance of the job coordinator Michael Ward. 4. Mr. Crusoe will report as instructed to Probation and submit to random urinalysis. He will attend any substance abuse treatment if recommended by his Probation officer. Any diluted specimen will be considered a violation. 3. Mr. Crusoe will seek stress management counseling on his own with the assistance of his brother Joe Lewis. If deemed necessary, he will attend any counseling for any reason offered in a group or individualized setting at the Nova House at the discretion of his Probation Officer. He will also attend verifiable AA/NA meetings on a regular basis. 4. Mr. Crusoe will truthfully answer all inquiries made by the Probation Officer and the Court. 5. Mr. Crusoe will abide by all the previously imposed conditions of his supervised release. Failure to follow through with any of segment of this Supervision Plan will be considered a violation of supervision and reported to the Court. _____________
Daryl Crusoe, Defendant
_____________
Thomas Anderson, Esq.
_____________
Kristin A. Keyer, U.S. Probation Officer


Summaries of

United States v. Crusoe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 11, 2013
Case No. 3:06cr157 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 11, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Crusoe

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DARYL ANTHONY CRUSOE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 11, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:06cr157 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 11, 2013)