From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Crowder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Nov 28, 2017
No. 3:17-CR-095 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 28, 2017)

Opinion

No. 3:17-CR-095

11-28-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVID EDGAR CROWDER


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Now before the court is the defendant's first motion to continue his trial date. [Doc. 16]. Defense counsel states that additional time is needed to conduct further investigation and to review discovery. According to the motion, the United States does not oppose the requested relief.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the motion outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). In light of the reasoning set forth by the defendant, the court finds that the failure to grant the motion would deny the defense reasonable time necessary for effective preparation. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The motion requires a delay in the proceedings. Therefore, all the time from the filing of the motion to the new trial date is excludable as provided by the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

The defendant's motion [doc. 16] is GRANTED. This criminal case is CONTINUED from December 19, 2017, to Tuesday, January 30, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Knoxville. The new plea cutoff date is January 16, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTER:

s/ Leon Jordan

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Crowder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Nov 28, 2017
No. 3:17-CR-095 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 28, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Crowder

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVID EDGAR CROWDER

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Date published: Nov 28, 2017

Citations

No. 3:17-CR-095 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 28, 2017)