From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cotton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 10, 2012
Case No. 3:11-cr-00012-11 (M.D. Tenn. May. 10, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cr-00012-11

05-10-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LAMONT COTTON


Document #919 is GRANTED.

Senior Judge


DEFENDANT LAMONT COTTON'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO JOIN IN

AND ADOPT CERTAIN PRETRIAL MOTIONS

COMES NOW the Defendant, Lamont Cotton, by and through his undersigned counsel, and hereby moves the Court for leave to join in and adopt certain pending pretrial motions filed by codefendants. Specifically, Mr. Cotton requests that he be allowed to join in and adopt the following filings:

1. Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained Pursuant to Unlawful Wiretap (TT5 and TT6) (Docket Entry 828);

As noted in Mr. Cotton's motion to suppress fruits of electronic surveillance occurring over Target Telephones 5 and 8, he is a statutorily recognized "aggrieved person" and has standing to challenge the interception of Target Telephones 5 and 8 since his wire communications were intercepted on both lines. (Docket Entries 899 & 900).

2. Motion to Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained Pursuant to Unlawful Wiretap (TT7, TT8 and TT5 Renewal) (Docket Entry 875); and,

3. Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained Pursuant to Unlawful Wiretaps: TT1, TT2, TT3, TT4, TT5, TT6, TT7, TT8, TT9, TT10, TT11. (Docket Entry 748).


Summaries of

United States v. Cotton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 10, 2012
Case No. 3:11-cr-00012-11 (M.D. Tenn. May. 10, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Cotton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LAMONT COTTON

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: May 10, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cr-00012-11 (M.D. Tenn. May. 10, 2012)