From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Corona-Ponce

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 16, 2006
167 F. App'x 628 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted February 13, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Mark Childs, AUSA, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marcia J. Brewer, Esq., Law Offices of Marcia J. Brewer, Culver City, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-03-00517-MMM-3.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Joel Corona-Ponce appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy and possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Although Corona-Ponce's sentence was imposed at a time when the Sentencing Guidelines were mandatory, the district court imposed the mandatory minimum under the statute, which was neither driven by the Guidelines nor exceeded the maximum authorized by the facts established by a plea of guilty. See United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 756, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005); United States v. Dare, 425 F.3d 634, 643 (9th Cir.2005).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Corona-Ponce

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 16, 2006
167 F. App'x 628 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Corona-Ponce

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Joel CORONA-PONCE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 16, 2006

Citations

167 F. App'x 628 (9th Cir. 2006)