United States v. Corona

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE M. CORONA Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 1, 2015

2:08 cr-00302-GW (C.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2015)

Opinion

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE M. CORONA Defendant. No. 2:08 cr-00302-GW United States District Court, C.D. California. April 1, 2015

          ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING (Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1(a)(6) Allegations of Violations of Probation Supervised Release) Conditions of Release)

          JOHN E. McDERMOTT, Magistrate Judge.

         On arrest warrant issued by a United States District Court involving alleged violations of conditions of probation or Supervised Release,

         The court finds no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably assure:

         (A) (x) the appearance of defendant as required; and/or

         (B) (x) the safety of any person or the community.

         The court concludes:

         A. (x) Defendant poses a risk to the safety of other persons or the community because defendant has not demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that:

THERE ARE ANY CONDITIONS OR COMBINATION OF CONDITIONS WHICH WILL MITIGATE THE RISK OF DANGER TO THE COMMUNITY.

(B) (x) Defendant is a flight risk because defendant has not shown by clear and convincing evidence that:

THERE ARE ANY CONDITIONS OR COMBINATION OF CONDITIONS WHICH WILL MITIGATE THE RISK OF NON-APPEARANCE.

         IT IS ORDERED that defendant be detained.