From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Corey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 23, 2018
No. 17-CR-2051-LRR (N.D. Iowa Jan. 23, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-CR-2051-LRR

01-23-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RONALD COREY, Defendant.


ORDER REGARDING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING DEFENDANT'S GUILTY PLEA

I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

On July 18, 2017, a two-count Indictment was filed against Defendant Ronald Corey. On January 5, 2018, Defendant appeared before United States Chief Magistrate Judge C.J. Williams and entered pleas of guilty to Counts 1 and 12 of the Indictment. On January 8, 2018, Judge Williams filed a Report and Recommendation in which he recommended that Defendant's guilty pleas be accepted. No objections to Judge Williams's Report and Recommendation were filed. The court, therefore, undertakes the necessary review of Judge Williams's recommendation to accept Defendant's pleas in this case.

II. ANALYSIS

Pursuant to statute, this court's standard of review for a magistrate judge's report and recommendation is as follows:

A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Similarly, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 59(b) provides for review of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation on dispositive motions, where objections are made, as follows:
The district judge must consider de novo any objection to the magistrate judge's recommendation. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommendation, receive further evidence, or resubmit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.
Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(3).

In this case, no objections have been filed, and it appears to the court upon review of Judge Williams's findings and conclusions that there is no ground to reject or modify them. Therefore, the court ACCEPTS Judge Williams's Report and Recommendation of January 8, 2018, and ACCEPTS Defendant's pleas of guilty in this case to Counts 1 and 12 of the Indictment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 23rd day of January, 2018.

/s/_________

LINDA R. READE, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA

United States v. Cortez-Hernandez, 673 F. App'x 587, 590-91 (8th Cir. 2016) (per curiam), suggests that a defendant may have the right to de novo review of a magistrate judge's recommendation to accept a plea of guilty even if no objection is filed. But see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b). The district court judge will undertake a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation if a written request for such review is filed within fourteen days after this order is filed.


Summaries of

United States v. Corey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 23, 2018
No. 17-CR-2051-LRR (N.D. Iowa Jan. 23, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Corey

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RONALD COREY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 23, 2018

Citations

No. 17-CR-2051-LRR (N.D. Iowa Jan. 23, 2018)