From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Contreras

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jun 29, 2019
CR No. 05-1150 JB (D.N.M. Jun. 29, 2019)

Opinion

CR No. 05-1150 JB

06-29-2019

UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. JOHN NORBERT CONTRERAS, Defendant.

Parties and counsel: John C. Anderson United States Attorney Fred J. Federici Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Albuquerque, New Mexico Counsel for the Plaintiff John Norbert Contreras Federal Correctional Institution Cumberland Cumberland, Maryland Defendant pro se


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendant's Motion to Reduce Sentence, filed April 22, 2019 (Doc. 159)("Motion to Reduce"); and (ii) the Motion to Appoint Counsel, filed April 25, 2019 (Doc. 160)("Motion for Counsel"). Defendant John Norbert Contreras asks the Court to advise him whether he is eligible for a reduced sentence under the First Step Act, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194. The First Step Act contains a number of sentencing reform provisions that impact mandatory minimums, criminal history points, and the "three-strike" mandatory penalty under 18 U.S.C. § 841. Only one sentencing reform provision, however, is retroactive. Section 404 of the First Step Act retroactively applies the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, allowing the Court to impose a reduced sentence for certain crack-cocaine offenders convicted before August of 2010. See Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, § 404(b) (retroactively applying the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010); United States v. Gay, 771 F.3d 681, 684 (10th Cir. 2014)(stating that the Fair Sentencing Act "reduced the statutory penalty disparity between cocaine powder and crack cocaine"). For all other offenses, the new sentencing reform provisions benefit only individuals who were convicted after December 21, 2018, when Congress enacted the First Step Act. See Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, §§ 401(c); 402(b); and 403(b).

Defendant John Norbert Contreras is not a crack-cocaine offender. A jury convicted him of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a) and 3559(c). See Jury Verdict at 1, filed August 16, 2006 (Doc. 95); Judgement at 1, filed March 5, 2007 (Doc. 117). Contreras was also convicted and sentenced before the First Step Act was enacted; by a Judgment entered March 5, 2007, the Court sentenced him to life imprisonment. See Judgment at 2. Contreras is therefore not eligible for resentencing under the First Step, and the Court will deny both the Motion to Reduce and the Motion for Counsel. To the extent that the Motion to Reduce also discusses Contreras' conditions of confinement in prison, he must raise those claims in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Palma-Salazar v. Davis, 677 F.3d 1031, 1035 (10th Cir. 2012)("[A] prisoner who challenges the conditions of his confinement must do so through a civil rights action.").

IT IS ORDERED that: (i) the Defendant's Motion to Reduce Sentence, filed April 22, 2019 (Doc. 159), is denied; and (ii) the Motion to Appoint Counsel, filed April 25, 2019 (Doc. 160) is denied.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Parties and counsel: John C. Anderson

United States Attorney
Fred J. Federici

Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
Albuquerque, New Mexico

Counsel for the Plaintiff John Norbert Contreras
Federal Correctional Institution Cumberland Cumberland, Maryland

Defendant pro se


Summaries of

United States v. Contreras

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jun 29, 2019
CR No. 05-1150 JB (D.N.M. Jun. 29, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Contreras

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. JOHN NORBERT CONTRERAS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Jun 29, 2019

Citations

CR No. 05-1150 JB (D.N.M. Jun. 29, 2019)

Citing Cases

United States v. Stevens

In fact, only § 404 of the FSA is retroactive, allowing a reduced sentence for certain crack-cocaine…

United States v. Muñoz

Consequently, he is not eligible for relief under the First Step Act. See United States v. Contreras, 332…