From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Coleman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 12, 2013
CR. No. 1:10-cr-00417-AWI (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2013)

Opinion

CR. No. 1:10-cr-00417-AWI

02-12-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER COLEMAN, PAUL VAN DALEN, SEAN PLYMALE, and MICHAEL MANFREDI, Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney ELANA S. LANDAU Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul Q. Goyette PAUL A. GOYETTE Attorney for Defendant Christopher Coleman E. MARSHALL HODGKINS Attorney for Defendant Sean Plymale THOMAS E. PEREZ Assistant Attorney General Jared Fishman Trial Attorney HARRY S. STERN Attorney for Defendant Paul Van Dalen W. SCOTT QUINLAN Attorney for Defendant Michael Manfredi


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
ELANA S. LANDAU
Assistant United States Attorney
4401 Federal Building
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721
Telephone: (559) 447-4000
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Assistant Attorney General
JARED FISHMAN
Trial Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division, Criminal Section
601 D Street NW
Washington, DC 20004
Telephone: (202) 514-3204

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

AND EXCLUDE TIME

The parties request that the status conference in this case be continued from February 19, 2013 to March 18, 2013 at 1:30p.m.. They stipulate that the time between February 19, 2013 and March 18, 2013 should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel may have reasonable time necessary for effective consideration of how to proceed with the case following the recent mistrial following a five-week jury trial and to allow for possible plea negotiations, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney
By: ____________________________

ELANA S. LANDAU

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Paul Q. Goyette

PAUL A. GOYETTE

Attorney for Defendant

Christopher Coleman

____________________________

E. MARSHALL HODGKINS

Attorney for Defendant

Sean Plymale

THOMAS E. PEREZ

Assistant Attorney General
By: ____________________________

Jared Fishman

Trial Attorney

____________________________

HARRY S. STERN

Attorney for Defendant

Paul Van Dalen

____________________________

W. SCOTT QUINLAN

Attorney for Defendant

Michael Manfredi
IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Coleman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 12, 2013
CR. No. 1:10-cr-00417-AWI (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Coleman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER COLEMAN, PAUL VAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 12, 2013

Citations

CR. No. 1:10-cr-00417-AWI (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2013)