From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cole

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 20, 2024
12-CR-802-1 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 20, 2024)

Opinion

12-CR-802-1 (JMF)

11-20-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TREVOR COLE, Defendant.


ORDER

JESSE M. FURMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Defendant Trevor Cole, proceeding without counsel, filed the attached “Demand for Discovery Under Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(a).” Construing the demand as a motion, the Court denies the motion as meritless because judgment has already been entered (and affirmed) in this case. See ECF Nos. 100, 262. Even if Cole had filed a motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 - which he has not - discovery would be available only for “good cause,” Rule 6(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings, and any request for discovery would have to “provide reasons for the request,” id. Rule 6(b). Cole provides no “reasons for the request” and certainly does not demonstrate “good cause.” Accordingly, his “demand” for discovery is denied. See United States v. LoCascio, 502 F.Supp.3d 708, 720 (E.D.N.Y. 2020).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to:

Trevor Cole
Reg. No. 67573-054
U.S.P. ATWATER
P.O. Box 019001
Atwater, CA 95301

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Cole

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 20, 2024
12-CR-802-1 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 20, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Cole

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TREVOR COLE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 20, 2024

Citations

12-CR-802-1 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 20, 2024)