From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Coakley

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 20, 2016
No. 16-7165 (4th Cir. Dec. 20, 2016)

Opinion

No. 16-7165

12-20-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLARENCE D. COAKLEY, Defendant - Appellant.

Clarence D. Coakley, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Assistant United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:96-cr-00026-BO-1) Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam. Clarence D. Coakley, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Assistant United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Clarence D. Coakley appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 187 (4th Cir. 2010) ("[A] defendant who was convicted of a crack offense but sentenced pursuant to a mandatory statutory minimum sentence is ineligible for a reduction under § 3582(c)(2)."). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Coakley

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 20, 2016
No. 16-7165 (4th Cir. Dec. 20, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Coakley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLARENCE D. COAKLEY…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 20, 2016

Citations

No. 16-7165 (4th Cir. Dec. 20, 2016)

Citing Cases

United States v. Coakley

The Court denied Coakley's motion [DE 138], and the court of appeals affirmed the denial, noting that a…