From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Clegg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Nov 13, 2019
Case No. 3:14-cr-122 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 13, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14-cr-122 Also 3:19-cv-232

11-13-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH CLEGG, JR., Defendant.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 81), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Supplemental Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's § 2255 motion be dismissed with prejudice. Defendant is DENIED a certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.

DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this 13th day of November, 2019.

*s/Thomas M. Rose

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Clegg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Nov 13, 2019
Case No. 3:14-cr-122 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 13, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Clegg

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH CLEGG, JR., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Nov 13, 2019

Citations

Case No. 3:14-cr-122 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 13, 2019)

Citing Cases

Hobgood v. United States

But the Supreme Court has not made Rehaif retroactively applicable on collateral review. See, e.g., United…