From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Mar 28, 2019
CASE NO.: 3:18-CR-395-K (01) (N.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 3:18-CR-395-K (01)

03-28-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ERAYCIO CLARK


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

ERACIO CLARK, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts 1, 2, and 3 of the 8 Count Indictment, filed on August 7, 2018. After cautioning and examining Defendant Eraycio Clark, under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that Defendant Eraycio Clark, be adjudged guilty of (Count 1) - Conspiracy to Interfere With Commerce by Robbery, in violation of 18 USC § 1951(a); (Count 2) - Interference With Commerce by Robbery, and Aiding and Abetting, in violation of 18 USC § 1951(a) and 2; and (Count 3) - Using, Carrying, and Brandishing a Firearm During and in Relation to, and Possessing and Brandishing a Firearm in Furtherance of, a Crime of Violence, and Aiding and Abetting in violation of 18 USC § 924(c)((1)(A(ii) and 2 and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the district judge, [v] The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody. [ ] The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

[ ] The Government does not oppose release.
[ ] The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.
[ ] I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

[ ] The Government opposes release.
[ ] The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.
[ ] If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the Government.
[ ] The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Signed March 28, 2019.

/s/_________

REBECCA RUTHERFORD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B).


Summaries of

United States v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Mar 28, 2019
CASE NO.: 3:18-CR-395-K (01) (N.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ERAYCIO CLARK

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Mar 28, 2019

Citations

CASE NO.: 3:18-CR-395-K (01) (N.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2019)