From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jan 29, 2013
Case No. 3:99-cr-86 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 29, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:99-cr-86 Civil Case No. 3:10-cv-406

01-29-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JACK CLARK, Defendant.


District Judge Walter H. Rice

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman


DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC.

#1263) IN ITS ENTIRETY; DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS TO ALTER OR

AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 59(e) (DOCS. #1261, #1262)

The Court has reviewed the December 6, 2012 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #1263), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2) has expired, the Court adopts the aforesaid Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

Defendant's Motions to Alter or Amend Judgment Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) (Docs. #1261, #1262) are denied. If Defendant appeals this decision to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, he is denied a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

_________________________

WALTER HERBERT RICE, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jan 29, 2013
Case No. 3:99-cr-86 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 29, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JACK CLARK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Jan 29, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:99-cr-86 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 29, 2013)