From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cina-Puente

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 22, 2013
Case No.: 3:12CR033 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 22, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:12CR033

02-22-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE ABEL CINA-PUENTE aka, Juan Castillo-Puente Defendant.


Judge Thomas M. Rose


FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE

OF DEFENDANT JOSE ABEL CINA-PUENTE'S ASSETS

WHEREAS, on August 13, 2012, this Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, (Doc. 17) ordering the forfeiture, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) of the following property:

a. .25 caliber Raven Arms model MP-25 hand gun, Serial No. 670938;
b. 19 rounds of Union Metallic Cartridge Company/Remington Arms Company, Inc. ammunition.

WHEREAS, the United States published notice of this forfeiture action and the intent of the United States to dispose of the property in accordance with law, and further notified all parties of their right to petition the Court for a hearing to adjudicate the validity of their alleged interest in the property, beginning on August 15, 2012 and continuing for at least thirty (30) consecutive days, on the www.forfeiture.gov website (Doc. 22); and

WHEREAS, the United States did not send direct written notice of the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture because there was no person who reasonably appeared to be a potential claimant with standing to contest the forfeiture of the property in an ancillary proceeding; and

WHEREAS, no timely petition has been filed to the property listed above; and

WHEREAS, the Court finds that defendant had an interest in the property; the United States has established the requisite nexus between the property and the offense; and the United States has established that the property is subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c);

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture entered in this action on August 13, 2012 (Doc. 17), ordering the forfeiture, pursuant 18 U.S.C. § 924(d)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), of the following property:

a. .25 caliber Raven Arms model MP-25 hand gun, Serial No. 670938;
b. 19 rounds of Union Metallic Cartridge Company/Remington Arms Company, Inc. ammunition
is final; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all right, title and interest to the property described above is hereby condemned, forfeited and vested in the United States of America and the United States has clear title to the property described above; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the custodian of the property is hereby authorized to dispose of the property in accordance with the law; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the United States District Court shall retain jurisdiction in the case for the purpose of enforcing this Final Order of Forfeiture. SO ORDERED:

_________________

THOMAS M. ROSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Cina-Puente

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 22, 2013
Case No.: 3:12CR033 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 22, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Cina-Puente

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE ABEL CINA-PUENTE aka, Juan…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 22, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 3:12CR033 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 22, 2013)