From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Christenson

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 27, 1936
82 F.2d 311 (9th Cir. 1936)

Opinion

No. 7904.

February 27, 1936.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Montana; Charles N. Pray, Judge.

Action by Jens P. Christenson against the United States of America. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.

John B. Tansil, U.S. Atty., of Butte, Mont., Alexander Holtzoff, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and W.M. Smith, Atty., Department of Justice, of Washington, D.C., for the United States.

Molumby, Busha Greenan, of Great Falls, Mont., for appellee.


This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff upon a policy of war risk insurance. The case was tried without a jury. The evidence tends to show that before the policy lapsed plaintiff was suffering from a tubercular spine and that under these circumstances the injured man should not work while the condition was acute. When it became chronic his disability was total and permanent. The law is so well settled in these cases that we content ourselves with citation of United States v. National Bank of Commerce of Seattle (C.C.A.) 73 F.2d 721; United States v. Kane (C.C.A.) 70 F.2d 396; United States v. Baker (C.C.A.) 73 F.2d 691.

Upon consideration of the record and briefs, and after oral arguments of counsel for respective parties, ordered, judgment of District Court affirmed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and mandate of this court issue pursuant to provisions of rule 32.


Summaries of

United States v. Christenson

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 27, 1936
82 F.2d 311 (9th Cir. 1936)
Case details for

United States v. Christenson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. CHRISTENSON

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 27, 1936

Citations

82 F.2d 311 (9th Cir. 1936)