From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Christensen

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 1, 2015
15-cr-193 MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2015)

Opinion

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, Federal Defender, MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service, Sacramento, CA, Attorney for Defendant JOHN RICHARD CHRISTENSEN.

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, ROGER YANG, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Attorney for Plaintiff.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE/CHANGE OF PLEA AND EXCLUDING TIME

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, ROGER YANG, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, HEATHER WILLIAMS, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, attorney for JOHN RICHARD CHRISTENSEN that the status conference/change of plea hearing date of October 1, 2015 be vacated, and the matter be set for status conference/change of plea on October 8, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.

         The continuance is requested for defense counsel to meet and confer with the defendant regarding the proposed plea offer and resolution of this case.

         Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded of this order's date through and including October 8, 2015; pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

          ORDER

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

         The Court orders the time from the date the parties stipulated, up to and including October 8, 2015, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4). It is further ordered the October 1, 2015 status conference/change of plea shall be continued until October 8, 2015, at 9:00 a.m.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Christensen

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 1, 2015
15-cr-193 MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Christensen

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN RICHARD CHRISTENSEN…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 1, 2015

Citations

15-cr-193 MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2015)