Opinion
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; Frank C. Damrell, District Judge, Presiding.
Richard J. Bender, Asst. U.S. Atty., Matthew Stegman, USSC-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Danny D. Brace, Jr., Law Office of Danny D. Brace, Jr., Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KOZINSKI, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Chok Chai Chow appeals the 18-month sentence imposed upon the district court's revocation of his supervised release term. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
We enforce Chow's appeal waiver and dismiss the appeal because Chow's 18
Page 227.
month sentence is below the 24-month maximum sentence agreed upon by the parties, and because Chow does not contend that his waiver was unknowing or involuntary. United States v. Nunez, 223 F.3d 956, 958-59 (9th Cir.2000) (dismissing an appeal because a defendant signed an unambiguous waiver of appeal, and because he waived the issue of whether it was knowing or voluntary by failing to raise the issue on appeal).
DISMISSED.