From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Chim

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 23, 2013
1:13-CR-00136-AWI (E.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2013)

Opinion

          ANTHONY P. CAPOZZI, CSBN: 068525, NICHOLAS A. CAPOZZI, CSBN: 275568, LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY P. CAPOZZI, Fresno, California, Attorney for Defendant, SARITH CHIM.

          Grant Rabenn Assistant United States Attorney


          STIPULATION AND ORDER PERMITTING DEFENDANT TO TRAVEL TO THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

          ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.

         On April 22, 2013, defendant Sarith Chim made his initial appearance before this Court on an indictment filed in the Eastern District of California charging him with conspiracy to manufacture, distribute, and possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance, structuring conspiracy, and structuring. Mr. Chim was released on a Property Bond in September 2013 and in the custody of a third party, Ms. Sarong Chao, under conditions set by this Court. Two such conditions are that the Defendant may not travel outside of Tulare, Kern, Kings, Fresno, and Madera Counties without the Court's permission and is participating in Home Detention with electronic monitoring.

         Mr. Chim wishes to travel by car to Long Beach with his custodian, Sarong Chao, and his four nieces and nephews to visit his mother at her residence and pick-up his step-son.

         The City of Long Beach is in the Central District of California and is outside the travel restrictions under Mr. Chim's current conditions of release. United States Pretrial Services Officers Monty Olson and Darrel Walker were contacted by my office concerning this request to travel outside of the Eastern District of California. Both Mr. Olson and Mr. Walker do not have a problem with the Defendant traveling to Long Beach, but request that Defendant first obtain permission from the Court and complies with any restrictions that Pretrial Services may impose on such travel.

         Accordingly, the parties agree and stipulate that Mr. Chim's conditions of release should be modified as follows: Mr. Chim shall be permitted to travel by car to and from the Central District of California, at approximately 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, January 1, 2014, and returning by 9:00 p.m. on Saturday, January 4, 2014, with the advance permission of, and as directed by, Pretrial Services.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

          ORDER

         For reasons set forth above, the Defendant's conditions of pretrial release shall be modified as follows: The Defendant shall be permitted to travel by car to and from the Central District of California, at approximately 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, January 1, 2014, and returning at approximately 9:00 p.m. on Saturday, January 4, 2014, with the advance permission of, and as directed by, Pretrial Services. All other conditions shall remain in effect.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Chim

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 23, 2013
1:13-CR-00136-AWI (E.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Chim

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SARITH CHIM, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 23, 2013

Citations

1:13-CR-00136-AWI (E.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2013)