From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Yath

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 30, 2013
1:13-cr-00136-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2013)

Opinion

1:13-cr-00136-AWI-BAM

04-30-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SDEY CHIM, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney GRANT B. RABENN Assistant U.S. Attorney FRANCINE ZEPEDA JANET BATEMAN Attorneys for Defendant


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
GRANT B. RABENN
Assistant U.S. Attorneys
2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401
Fresno, California 93721
Telephone: (559) 497-4000
Facsimile: (559) 497-4099
Attorneys for the

United States of America

STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE

ORDER BETWEEN THE UNITED

STATES AND DEFENDANT SDEY CHIM

WHEREAS, the discovery in this case is voluminous and contains a large amount of personal and confidential information including but not limited to Social Security numbers, dates of birth, bank account numbers, telephone numbers, and residential addresses ("Protected Information"); and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to avoid both the necessity of large scale redactions and the unauthorized disclosure or dissemination of this information to anyone not a party to the court proceedings in this matter;

The parties agree that entry of a stipulated protective order is appropriate.

THEREFORE, Defendant Sdey Chim ("Defendant"), by and through his counsel of record, Francine Zepeda and Janet Bateman ("Defense Counsel"), and the United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Grant B. Rabenn, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

1. This Court may enter a protective order pursuant to Rule 16(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and its general supervisory authority.

2. This Order pertains to all discovery provided to or made available to Defense Counsel as part of discovery in this case (hereafter, collectively known as "the discovery").

3. By signing this Stipulation and Protective Order, Defense Counsel agrees not to share any documents that contain Protected Information with anyone other than Defense Counsel attorneys, designated defense investigators, and support staff. Defense Counsel may permit Defendant to view unredacted documents in the presence of his attorney, defense investigators, and support staff. The parties agree that Defense Counsel, defense investigators, and support staff shall not allow Defendant to copy Protected Information contained in the discovery. The parties agree that Defense Counsel, defense investigators, and support staff may provide Defendant with copies of documents from which Protected Information has been redacted.

4. The discovery and information therein may be used only in connection with the litigation of this case and for no other purpose. The discovery is now and will forever remain the property of the United States of America ("Government"). Defense Counsel will return the discovery to the Government or certify that it has been shredded at the conclusion of the case.

5. Defense Counsel will store the discovery in a secure place and will use reasonable care to ensure that it is not disclosed to third persons in violation of this agreement.

6. Defense Counsel shall be responsible for advising Defendant, employees, and other members of the defense team, and defense witnesses of the contents of this Stipulation and Order.

7. In the event that Defendant substitutes counsel, undersigned Defense Counsel agrees to withhold discovery from new counsel unless and until substituted counsel agrees also to be bound by this Order.

8. Defense Counsel reserves the right to later seek to have the terms of this Order modified or revoked. Defense Counsel agrees to return the discovery to the Government in its complete form if the terms of this Order are modified or revoked if so requested by the United States.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: __________

GRANT B. RABENN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

By: __________

FRANCINE ZEPEDA

JANET BATEMAN

Attorneys for Defendant
IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Yath

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 30, 2013
1:13-cr-00136-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Yath

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHANRATH YIM YATH, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 30, 2013

Citations

1:13-cr-00136-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2013)