From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Chavez

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 17, 2023
11-cr-00331-MMC-1 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2023)

Opinion

11-cr-00331-MMC-1

03-17-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PETE AGAPITO CHAVEZ, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING REQUEST OF APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

MAXINE M. CHESNEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court is in receipt of a letter, dated February 13, 2023, in which defendant Pete Agapito Chavez requests appointment of counsel for the purpose of advising him, and perhaps challenging, the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) determination as to the length of his stay in a halfway house near the end of his prison term. (See Dkt. No. 159.) Although defendant cites to the Second Chance Act, that legislation does not create an enforceable right to early release to a halfway house or to such release for any particular length of time. See, e.g., McDonald v. Obama, 2010 WL 1526443, at *1 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 15, 2010), report and recommendation adopted, 2010 WL 1526447 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 15, 2010). Additionally, to the extent defendant might choose to challenge his continued confinement by way of a habeas corpus petition, and, in connection therewith, seek appointment of counsel, such relief must be sought in the district wherein he is confined, which, in this case, is the Central District of California.

Accordingly, the request for appointment of counsel is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Chavez

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 17, 2023
11-cr-00331-MMC-1 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Chavez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PETE AGAPITO CHAVEZ, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 17, 2023

Citations

11-cr-00331-MMC-1 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2023)