From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Chavez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 7, 2011
Case No. 11-00002-01-CR-W-ODS (W.D. Mo. Sep. 7, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 11-00002-01-CR-W-ODS

09-07-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH M. CHAVEZ, Defendant.


ORDER (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORTS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (DOCS. 55, 56, & 58), AND

(2) DENYING MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS (DOCS. 34, 40, & 41)

The Honorable Robert E. Larsen issued his Reports and Recommendations concluding that the Court should deny Defendant's motions to suppress. The parties have not filed objections to the Reports and Recommendations, and the time for doing so has passed. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 74.1(a)(2). Upon careful and independent review of the suppression hearing transcript, as well as the applicable law, the Court agrees with the Reports and Recommendations that the searches and seizures conducted by law enforcement were lawful. Judge Larsen's Reports and Recommendations are adopted as the Order of the Court. Defendant's motions to suppress are denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ORTRIE D. SMITH, SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Chavez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 7, 2011
Case No. 11-00002-01-CR-W-ODS (W.D. Mo. Sep. 7, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Chavez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH M. CHAVEZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 7, 2011

Citations

Case No. 11-00002-01-CR-W-ODS (W.D. Mo. Sep. 7, 2011)

Citing Cases

Washington v. Goplin

Whether these items were lawfully seized incident to Plaintiff's arrest or as the result of an inventory…