From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Charles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 25, 2013
NO. CR. S-08-580 LKK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2013)

Opinion

NO. CR. S-08-580 LKK

04-25-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DARYL CHARLES, Defendant.


ORDER

The defendant has filed what appears to be a motion objecting to the court's imposition of restitution, which also alleges deficient performance by counsel.

The motion as to restitution is DENIED, and thus, there's no deficiency performance regarding a failure to file the motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Charles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 25, 2013
NO. CR. S-08-580 LKK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Charles

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DARYL CHARLES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 25, 2013

Citations

NO. CR. S-08-580 LKK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2013)