From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Chapman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jul 9, 2012
No. 3:09-00244 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 9, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:09-00244

07-09-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GARY EUGENE CHAPMAN


JUDGE CAMPBELL


ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Motion To Withdraw (Docket No. 917), filed by counsel for Defendant Chapman. Through the Motion, and accompanying letter, the Defendant requests that the Court appoint new counsel to represent the Defendant on appeal. The Defendant filed a Notice of Appeal (Docket No. 916) to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals on July 6, 2012.

Sixth Circuit Rule 101(a) provides as follows:

(a) Continued Representation on Appeal. Trial counsel in criminal cases, whether retained or appointed by the district court, is responsible for the continued representation of the client on appeal until specifically relieved by this court.

In light of Sixth Circuit Rule 101, the Defendant's Motion is DENIED without prejudice to it being filed with the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.

It is so ORDERED.

_______________

TODD J. CAMPBELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Chapman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jul 9, 2012
No. 3:09-00244 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 9, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Chapman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GARY EUGENE CHAPMAN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jul 9, 2012

Citations

No. 3:09-00244 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 9, 2012)