From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Chaney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 18, 2012
No. 3:04-00053 (M.D. Tenn. May. 18, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:04-00053

05-18-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DARRELL CHANEY


Judge Wiseman


MOTION TO SERVE AS ELBOW COUNSEL

By Order entered October 19, 2011, the court appointed undersigned counsel to research and consult with Mr. Chaney to determine whether he is eligible for a sentence reduction based upon the Fair Sentencing Act and 2011 retroactive crack sentencing guidelines amendment.

In accordance with that order, defense counsel has researched the issue and corresponded with Mr. Chaney. Subsequent to this correspondence, Mr. Chaney filed a pro se Motion Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.S. § 3582. (D.E. 44). Defense counsel has no arguments to supplement those made by Mr. Chaney, but asks the Court to allow undersigned counsel to remain as elbow counsel so that she may consult Mr. Chaney should any new law be decided in support of his position.

Respectfully submitted,

______________________

CARYLL S. ALPERT (BPR# 017021)

Assistant Federal Public Defender

810 Broadway, Suite 200

Nashville, TN 37203

615-736-5047


Summaries of

United States v. Chaney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 18, 2012
No. 3:04-00053 (M.D. Tenn. May. 18, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Chaney

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DARRELL CHANEY

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: May 18, 2012

Citations

No. 3:04-00053 (M.D. Tenn. May. 18, 2012)