From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Centeno-Baez

United States District Court, Western District of New York
Apr 16, 2024
No. 24-CR-1-A (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 16, 2024)

Opinion

24-CR-1-A

04-16-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ALEXIS CENTENO-BAEZ, Defendant.


DECISION AND ORDER

HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

This case was referred to Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr. pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) for the conduct of pretrial proceedings. On March 27, 2024, Defendant Alexis Centeno-Baez appeared before Magistrate Judge Schroeder, waived his right to indictment (Dkt. No. 2) and entered a plea of guilty to a one-count Information (Dkt. No. 3), which charges him with possession with intent to distribute 40 grams or more of fentanyl in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), pursuant to a written plea agreement. (Dkt. No. 4).

Magistrate Judge Schroeder issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 6) confirming his oral findings that Defendant's plea of guilty was knowing, voluntary, and supported by a factual basis. No timely objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. It is hereby

ORDERED that, upon review of the waiver of indictment (Dkt. No. 2), the information (Dkt. No. 3), the plea agreement (Dkt. No. 4), the information pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 851 (Dkt. No. 5), and the plea transcript (Dkt. No. 7) of the March 27, 2024, change-of-plea proceeding before the Magistrate Judge; and the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that all the requirements of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 11 have been carefully followed. Defendant's waiver of his right to indictment together with his plea of guilty were knowing, voluntary, and supported by a factual basis. The Magistrate Judge informed Defendant, who was placed under oath and addressed personally in open court, of Defendant's rights and the trial rights he was waiving should the Court accept his plea of guilty, the nature of the charge to which he was pleading guilty, and any maximum possible penalty, among the other requirements listed in the Rule. The Magistrate Judge determined that Defendant understood the foregoing. Accordingly, Defendant's plea of guilty is accepted based upon the oral findings of the Magistrate Judge as confirmed in the written Report and Recommendation.

Sentencing is scheduled for July 24, 2024 at 12:30 pm. The parties are directed to the Court's forthcoming Text Order for the submission of sentencing documents.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Centeno-Baez

United States District Court, Western District of New York
Apr 16, 2024
No. 24-CR-1-A (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 16, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Centeno-Baez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ALEXIS CENTENO-BAEZ, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of New York

Date published: Apr 16, 2024

Citations

No. 24-CR-1-A (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 16, 2024)