From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Castro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Mar 13, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 97-1407 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 97-1407 CRIMINAL NO. H-93-210-6

03-13-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RAFAEL CASTRO, Defendant.


ORDER

Raphael Castro is a federal prison inmate convicted in 1996 after a lengthy jury trial of drug trafficking offenses and conspiracy to commit those offenses. Castro received a 292 month sentence. The Fifth Circuit affirmed his conviction and judgment in 1996. Castro's motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was denied and the Fifth Circuit affirmed. In March 2007, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Castro a certificate of appealability to challenge this court's denial of his 2006 challenge to the sentence he had received. In February 2012, Castro filed a motion requesting a copy of the transcript of his sentencing, at government expense. But there is no pending postconviction relief motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and could not be unless the Fifth Circuit granted Castro leave to file a successive petition. The record does not show that he has made such a request or, given his numerous prior challenges, that he would have a basis for doing so. A federal prisoner pursuing postconviction remedies is not entitled to transcripts at government expense merely because he is indigent. See United States v. Herrera, 474 F.2d 1049 (5th Cir.1973); United States v. Oquendo, 1995 WL 16789 (E .D. La.). Before a transcript is ordered, the court must certify that the claim asserted under section 2255 is not frivolous and that the transcript is needed to decide the issue raised. A federal prisoner is not entitled to obtain copies of court records at government expense to search for possible defects in the proceedings, to determine whether there is a basis to file a challenge. See Bonner v. Henderson, 517 F.2d 135, 136 (5th Cir. 1975); Campbell v. United States, 538 F.2d 692, 693 (5th Cir. 1976); United States v. Oquendo, 1995 WL 16789, *1 (E.D. La. 1995); United States v. Scott, 2000 WL 1818514, *1 (E.D. La.). The motion seeking a copy of the transcript, Docket Entry No. 715, is DENIED.

SIGNED on March 13, 2012, at Houston, Texas.

_______________

Lee H. Rosenthal

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Castro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Mar 13, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 97-1407 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Castro

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RAFAEL CASTRO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Mar 13, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 97-1407 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2012)