Opinion
Case No. 07-20100-04-JWL
10-27-2014
United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Mario Castillo, Defendant.
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
This matter is before the court on Mr. Castillo's pro se motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) in which Mr. Castillo asks the court to reduce his sentence based on a proposed amendment (Amendment 782) to the United States Sentencing Guidelines which will take effect on November 1, 2014 (absent Congressional action) and lower the base offense levels in the Drug Quantity Table. On July 18, 2014, the United States Sentencing Commission voted to apply the proposed amendment retroactively to those offenders currently in prison, but with a requirement that the reduced sentences cannot take effect until November 1, 2015.
The Honorable J. Thomas Marten of the District of Kansas recently appointed the Office of the Federal Public Defender to represent any defendant previously determined to have been entitled to appointment of counsel, or who is now indigent, to determine whether that defendant may qualify for relief under proposed Amendment 782. The record reflects that Mr. Castillo may be entitled to have the Federal Public Defender represent him to determine in the first instance whether Mr. Castillo qualifies for relief under the proposed amendment. In light of these circumstances, the court believes that the most efficient way to resolve the issue raised by Mr. Castillo is to forward Mr. Castillo's motion (along with a copy of this order) to the Office of the Federal Public Defender for an initial determination of whether Mr. Castillo qualifies for representation and is entitled to a reduction in his sentence in light of the proposed amendment. In the meantime, the court will deny Mr. Castillo's motion without prejudice to refiling the motion on or after February 2, 2015 if the Office of the Public Defender declines to seek relief for Mr. Castillo under Amendment 782.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT Mr. Castillo's motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (doc. 288) is denied without prejudice to refiling on or after February 2, 2015.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT the Clerk of the Court shall forward to the Office of the Federal Public Defender a copy of this order along with a copy of Mr. Castillo's pro se motion for reduction of sentence.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 27th day of October, 2014, at Kansas City, Kansas.
s/ John W. Lungstrum
John W. Lungstrum
United States District Judge