From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Castillo

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 23, 2021
19 Cr. 784 (GHW) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 23, 2021)

Opinion

19 Cr. 784 (GHW)

11-23-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JORGE CASTILLO, a/k/a “Jorge Alexis Castillo-Romero, ” Defendant.


PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/ MONEY JUDGMENT

HONORABLE GREGORY H. WOODS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WHEREAS, on or about November 4, 2019, JORGE CASTILLO, a/k/a “Jorge Alexis Castillo-Romero” (the “Defendant”), was charged in a two-count Indictment, 19 Cr. 784 (GHW) (the “Indictment”), with conspiracy to commit mail fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349 (Count One); and aggravated identity theft, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1028A(a)(1), 1028A(b) and 2 (Count Two);

WHEREAS, the Indictment included a forfeiture allegation as to Count One of the Indictment, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code Section 2461(c), of any and all property, real and personal, that constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment;

WHEREAS, on or about May 6, 2021, following a jury trial, the Defendant was found guilty of Count One of the Indictment;

WHEREAS, the Government asserts that $191,087.30 in United States currency represents proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained;

WHEREAS, the Government seeks the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $191,087.30 in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained; and

WHEREAS, the Court finds that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:

1. Asa result of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment, to Which the Defendant was found guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $191,087.30) in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the Defendant.

2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant, JORGE CASTILLO, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.

3. All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Department of Treasury, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.

4. The United States Department of Treasury or its designee shall be authorized to deposit the payment on the Money Judgment in the Treasury Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.

5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.

6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.

7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

8. The signature page of this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

United States v. Castillo

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 23, 2021
19 Cr. 784 (GHW) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 23, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Castillo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JORGE CASTILLO, a/k/a “Jorge Alexis…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 23, 2021

Citations

19 Cr. 784 (GHW) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 23, 2021)