From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Castillo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2013
NO. CR-S-12-265 LKK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2013)

Opinion

NO. CR-S-12-265 LKK

04-03-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT DANIEL CASTILLO, Defendant.

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692 Acting Federal Defender MATTHEW C. BOCKMON, Bar # 161566 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service Attorney for Defendant ROBERT DANIEL CASTILLO


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692
Acting Federal Defender
MATTHEW C. BOCKMON, Bar # 161566
Assistant Federal Defender
Designated Counsel for Service
Attorney for Defendant
ROBERT DANIEL CASTILLO

ORDER AFTER HEARING

This matter came on for Status Conference on Tuesday, April 2, 2013, in the courtroom of the Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton, Senior Judge. Assistant United States Attorney Jared Dolan appeared on behalf of the United States of America. Assistant Federal Defender Matthew C. Bockmon, appeared on behalf of Defendant Robert Daniel Castillo, who was present out of custody.

A Further Status Conference/Change of Plea hearing date of Tuesday, April 23, 2013, at 9:15 a.m., was set.

Accordingly, the parties stipulated and agreed that the time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from April 2, 2013, up to and including April 23, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)&(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4, and that the ends of justice to be served in continuing this matter to allow defendant further time to prepare outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants to a speedy trial.

Good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is continued to Tuesday, April 23, 2013, at 9:15 a.m.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)&(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, the period from April 2, 2013, up to and including April 23, 2013, is excluded from the time computations required by the Speedy Trial Act due to ongoing preparation of counsel, and that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

_________________________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Castillo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2013
NO. CR-S-12-265 LKK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Castillo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT DANIEL CASTILLO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 3, 2013

Citations

NO. CR-S-12-265 LKK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2013)