From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Casey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
Jun 30, 2015
Case No. 1:13-cr-052 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 30, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 1:13-cr-052 Also 1:15-cv-045

06-30-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SEAN P. CASEY, Defendant.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #73), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Amended Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. §2255 (Doc. #65) be DENIED. Petitioner is DENIED any requested certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. June 30, 2015.

/s/_________

Susan J. Dlott

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Casey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
Jun 30, 2015
Case No. 1:13-cr-052 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 30, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Casey

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SEAN P. CASEY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI

Date published: Jun 30, 2015

Citations

Case No. 1:13-cr-052 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 30, 2015)