From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Carlisle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Mar 12, 2012
CR No.: 0:08-948-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 12, 2012)

Opinion

CR No.: 0:08-948-JFA

03-12-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JANICE MARIE CARLISLE


ORDER

The defendant has moved for early termination of her supervised release. After consulting with the United States Probation Office, the court is constrained to deny the motion at this time. The record reveals that the defendant was unemployed and made no payment toward her restitution during the initial six months of supervision. After being confronted with this fact, the defendant began making regular payments as of May 2011. Although she has not missed a monthly payment since that time, and although she is now gainfully employed, it appears to the court that early termination of supervised release might impair the defendant's willingness to make full restitution. According, the defendant's motion (ECF 62) is denied at this time.

Once the restitution balance falls below $1,000 and the defendant has completed two-thirds of her supervised release term, the court will consider early termination at that time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

March 12, 2012

Columbia, South Carolina

Joseph F. Anderson, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Carlisle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Mar 12, 2012
CR No.: 0:08-948-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 12, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Carlisle

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JANICE MARIE CARLISLE

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Date published: Mar 12, 2012

Citations

CR No.: 0:08-948-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 12, 2012)