From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cardona-Benitez

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 31, 2016
650 F. App'x 937 (9th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-10052

05-31-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MARIO ALBERTO CARDONA-BENITEZ, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 2:14-cr-01470-JJT MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
John J. Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding Before: REINHARDT, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Mario Alberto Cardona-Benitez appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 33-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Cardona-Benitez's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Cardona-Benitez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Cardona-Benitez waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

United States v. Cardona-Benitez

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 31, 2016
650 F. App'x 937 (9th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Cardona-Benitez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MARIO ALBERTO…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 31, 2016

Citations

650 F. App'x 937 (9th Cir. 2016)