From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Canales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Sep 24, 2013
CRIMINAL NO. H-10-697 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 24, 2013)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. H-10-697

2013-09-24

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KAREN MARIA ALVARENGA CANALES


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This criminal case is before the Court on Defendant Karen Maria Alvarenga Canales's Motion to Proceed Under Newly Recognized Right as Defined by the United States Supreme Court [Doc. # 30]. Defendant argues that the Supreme Court's decision in Descamps v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 133 S. Ct. 2276 (2013), requires that her sentence be modified. The Court denies Defendant's Motion.

Defendant was sentenced on March 2, 2011. The Judgment in a Criminal Case [Doc. # 28] was entered on March 10, 2011. Title 18, United States Code, section 3582(c) provides that a "court may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed except" in very limited circumstances, none of which apply in this case. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c); United States v. Marion, 79 F. App'x 46 (5th Cir. Oct. 22, 2003).

Defendant's reliance on the Supreme Court's recent decision in Descamps is unavailing. Initially, the Descamps case involved convictions under the Armed Career Criminal Act. Defendant Canales was convicted of illegal reentry into the United States following deportation, and this Court is unaware of any case applying Descamps to a conviction for that crime. Additionally, the Supreme Court has clearly stated that a new rule is not applied retroactively unless the Supreme Court specifically holds it to be retroactive. See Tyler v. Cain, 533 U.S. 656, 663 (2001). "The Supreme Court has not declared its decision in Descamps to be retroactively applicable on collateral review, nor has the undersigned found any cases applying Descamps retroactively to cases on collateral review." See Strickland v. English, 2013 WL 4502302, *8 (N.D. Fla. Aug. 22, 2013). Consequently, the Court is without jurisdiction to grant Defendant's request that her sentence be modified. It is hereby

ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Proceed Under Newly Recognized Right as Defined by the United States Supreme Court [Doc. # 30] is DENIED.

Signed at Houston, Texas, this 24th day of September, 2013.

____________________

Nancy F. Atlas

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Canales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Sep 24, 2013
CRIMINAL NO. H-10-697 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 24, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Canales

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KAREN MARIA ALVARENGA CANALES

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Sep 24, 2013

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. H-10-697 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 24, 2013)

Citing Cases

Baldwin v. United States

However, Descamps - and by extension, Royal - are not retroactive, and do nothing to salvage Baldwin's…