Opinion
CRIMINAL ACTION 6:21-cr-000121-3
11-01-2021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ADRIAN KEVIN CAMPBELL
ORDER
DREW B. TIPTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is pro se Defendant Adrian Kevin Campbell's motion requesting the Court “cease and desist” jurisdiction over him and this criminal case because he does not consent. (Dkt. No. 148). Campbell again asserts frivolous arguments that are commonly associated with the uniformly rejected “sovereign citizen” movement. See Watson v. Tex. State Univ., 829 Fed.Appx. 686 (5th Cir. 2020) (per curiam). These arguments are without any basis in law. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Campbell's motion. (Dkt. No. 148).
To be clear, these arguments are frivolous as the Court made clear in an in person hearing with the Defendant. During that hearing, the Defendant informed the Court that he would stop filing motions that had been repeatedly addressed by the Court. Unfortunately, the Defendant did not keep his word. The Defendant has filed motions on this same topic as many as 17 times now. The Court informed the Defendant that he would be sanctioned if he continues to do so.
It is SO ORDERED.