From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jul 17, 2012
3:11-cr-00012-12 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 17, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-cr-00012-12

07-17-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL BROWN, Defendant.


ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Michael Brown's Motion for Reconsideration, Document #887. The Motion correctly asserts that the Leon exception does not apply to wiretap attacks. However, here the exception was applied to a search of residence.

Defendant's Motion to Reconsider Court's Denial of Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained from Search of Michael Brown's Residence and Vehicles Located at His Residence, Document #887, is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

______________________

Thomas A. Wiseman, Jr.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jul 17, 2012
3:11-cr-00012-12 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 17, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL BROWN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jul 17, 2012

Citations

3:11-cr-00012-12 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 17, 2012)