From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Brown

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 22, 2023
4:19-CR-00399-01-LPR (E.D. Ark. Nov. 22, 2023)

Opinion

4:19-CR-00399-01-LPR

11-22-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. OZZIE DE'ANDRE BROWN DEFENDANT


ORDER

LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendant's Motion to Reduce Sentence (Doc. 29) is DENIED.

First, Defendant argues that none of his prior convictions were crimes of violence. To the contrary, Defendant had a prior conviction for robbery in Arkansas, which the Eighth Circuit has held is a crime of violence.

United States v. Smith, 928 F.3d 714, 717 (8th Cir. 2019) (holding that “both Arkansas robbery and Arkansas aggravated robbery are crimes of violence.”).

Second, Defendant asserts that he is entitled to a sentence reduction based on guideline Amendment 821's retroactive changes to “status points.” Applying Amendment 821, Defendant's criminal history score goes from 12 to 11. However, his criminal history category remains V, which means his guideline range is the same.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Brown

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 22, 2023
4:19-CR-00399-01-LPR (E.D. Ark. Nov. 22, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. OZZIE DE'ANDRE BROWN DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 22, 2023

Citations

4:19-CR-00399-01-LPR (E.D. Ark. Nov. 22, 2023)