Opinion
11-CR-6089
09-26-2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. JAMES BROME, Defendant
DECISION and ORDER
Siragusa, J. This case was referred by text order of the undersigned, entered on May 12, 2011, to Magistrate Judge Jonathan W. Feldman pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A)-(B), ECF No. 11. On September 26, 2011, Defendant filed an omnibus motion, ECF No. 81, seeking inter alia suppression of the following: fruits of Title III surveillance; physical evidence; and statements. On September 5, 2012, Magistrate Judge Feldman filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), ECF No. 166, recommending that the Court deny Defendant's applications to suppress. The time has passed for Defendant to file any objections to the R&R, and none have been filed.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Feldman's R&R, Defendant's application to suppress the fruits of Title III surveillance is denied, his application to suppress physical evidence is denied, and application to suppress statements is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: Rochester, New York
September 26, 2012
ENTER:
________________________
CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA
United States District Judge