Opinion
NO. 2:12-cr-00258 MCE
02-13-2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM BROCK, et al., Defendant.
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney By: TODD A. PICKLES AUSA SARA ZALKIN Attorney for Defendant WILLIAM BROCK, IV MICHAEL ETTINGER Attorney for Defendant WILLIAM BROCK, IV Pro Hac Vice LINDA PARISI PARISI Attorney for Defendant CHAD CALVERT
SARA ZALKIN, CSBN 223044
Attorney for Defendant
WILLIAM BROCK, IV
STIPULATION REGARDING AMENDED
BRIEFING SCHEDULE; [PROPOSED]
FINDINGS AND ORDER
Defendant William Brock, IV, by and through his counsel of record, and plaintiff, by and through its counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. At the request of the defense, and without objection from the government, the briefing schedule set forth in the previous stipulation and order (signed January 23, 2013) is hereby modified as follows:
2. Defense motions shall be filed by February 11, 2013 (instead of February 4, 2013), with all other dates to remain as set (March 25, 2013 for any opposition; April 15, 2013 for any replies; and a hearing date of May 9, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.).
3. Mr. Brock filed a motion to quash on January 31, 2013, with required a table of authorities and other formatting skill due to length, as will be true for his motion to traverse. However, due to an unforeseen staff shortage, additional time is needed.
4. Additionally, Ms. Parisi, counsel for co-defendant Mr. Calvert, is engaged in trial in another matter, impacting her ability to file or join any motions on her client's behalf.
5. The requested amendment should not change the time exclusions previously found by the Court in its order signed January 23, 2013, to wit: For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act (18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq.), within which the trial must commence, the time period of January 24, 2013 to May 9, 2013, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4], because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at the defendant's request, on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
______________________
By: TODD A. PICKLES
AUSA
SARA ZALKIN
______________________
Attorney for Defendant
WILLIAM BROCK, IV
MICHAEL ETTINGER
Attorney for Defendant
WILLIAM BROCK, IV
Pro Hac Vice
LINDA PARISI
PARISI
Attorney for Defendant
CHAD CALVERT
ORDER
At the request of the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED.
______________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND. JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE