From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Broadnax

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 14, 2013
Case No.2:11-CR-00068 MCE (E.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.2:11-CR-00068 MCE

03-14-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RAZHAM BROADNAX.

Law Offices of RON PETERS Ron Peters (SBN: 45749) Attorney for Defendant RAZHAM BROADNAX William S. Wong Assistant U.S. Attorney


Law Offices of RON PETERS
Ron Peters (SBN: 45749)
Attorney for Defendant
RAZHAM BROADNAX

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING SENTENCING

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the United States of Am erica, through its attorney of record, William Wong, Assistant U.S. Attorney; a nd, the defendant, Razham Broadnax through his attorney, Ron Peters, that the sentencing scheduled for March 14, 2013 at 9:00 am be continued to March 28, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.

The defense will require additional time to address issues regarding factors affecting guideline calculations and defendant's crim inal history which will require investigation regarding prior convictions. Additionally, defenda nt's attorney has appearances in other jurisdictions that will conflict with this appearance.

Both parties stipulate that there is a reasonable basis for the continuance due to defense preparation.

Respectfully submitted

By: ______________________

RON PETERS

Attorney for Defendant

RAZHAM BROADNAX

By: ______________________

William S. Wong

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, a dopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and defendant continuity of counsel. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and that the time from the date of the stipulation, March 14, 2013, to and including March 28, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Broadnax

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 14, 2013
Case No.2:11-CR-00068 MCE (E.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Broadnax

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RAZHAM BROADNAX.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 14, 2013

Citations

Case No.2:11-CR-00068 MCE (E.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2013)