From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Britton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Nov 19, 2012
Case No. 3:11-00207 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 19, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-00207

11-19-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LATONE ANTWAIN BRITTON


Chief Judge Haynes


UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING RESPONSE

The United States, by and through Jerry E. Martin, United States Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee, and J. Alex Little, Assistant United States Attorney, respectfully movesthe Court to grant an extension of two (2) days to file its response, currently due today, November 16, 2012 until November 20, 2012.

The United States is working to prepare that response but will not have it completed today. The United States seeks a continuance because, on October 23, 2012, the undersigned started a multi-defendant trial, in the case of United States v. Travis Gentry, et al., 3:11-cr-00082 (MDTN), before Judge Trauger. The undersigned's trial lasted an additional two weeks than expected and just ended today. The United States asks that the Court take into consideration the undersigned's professional obligations due to the trial and, on that basis, requests a two day extension of time to submit its response to the defendant's reconsideration motion.

WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully asks that the Court GRANT the government's motion for an extension of time to file a response.


Summaries of

United States v. Britton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Nov 19, 2012
Case No. 3:11-00207 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 19, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Britton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LATONE ANTWAIN BRITTON

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 19, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:11-00207 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 19, 2012)