From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Brinkley

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
May 12, 2022
3:21-cr-00252 (M.D. Tenn. May. 12, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cr-00252

05-12-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. TAVARUS BRINKLEY, Defendant.


William L. Campbell, Jr. Judge

ORDER

ALISTAIR E. NEWBERN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, the Court reminds the government of its obligation under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), to disclose evidence favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant's guilt or punishment. The government is ordered to comply with Brady and its progeny. The failure to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences, including dismissal of the indictment or information, exclusion of government evidence or witnesses, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, sanctions by the Court or any other remedy that is just under the circumstances.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Brinkley

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
May 12, 2022
3:21-cr-00252 (M.D. Tenn. May. 12, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Brinkley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. TAVARUS BRINKLEY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: May 12, 2022

Citations

3:21-cr-00252 (M.D. Tenn. May. 12, 2022)