From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Brim

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 2, 2012
486 F. App'x 382 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-6993

11-02-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WILLIAM TEEK BRIM, JR., Defendant - Appellant.

William Teek Brim, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Randall Stuart Galyon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:07-cr-00247-JAB-1) Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Teek Brim, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Randall Stuart Galyon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Teek Brim, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brim, No. 1:07-cr-00247-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. May 21, 2012). We deny Brim's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Brim

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 2, 2012
486 F. App'x 382 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Brim

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WILLIAM TEEK BRIM, JR.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 2, 2012

Citations

486 F. App'x 382 (4th Cir. 2012)