From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Nov 13, 2012
No. 3:09-00049-7 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 13, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:09-00049-7

11-13-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ERIC BRIGHT, Defendant.


Chief Judge Haynes


ORDER

The sentencing hearing in this action is re-set for Monday, December 10, 2012 at 3:30 p.m. By Friday, November 30, 2012, counsel shall submit their memoranda, response and/or reply as well as the number of witnesses to be called and the expected length of the hearing. Failure to comply with this deadline may result in the resetting of the sentencing hearing. Counsel shall be prepared to discuss any forfeiture issues.

It is so ORDERED.

________

WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR.

Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

United States v. Bright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Nov 13, 2012
No. 3:09-00049-7 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 13, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Bright

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ERIC BRIGHT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 13, 2012

Citations

No. 3:09-00049-7 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 13, 2012)