From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Brewington

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 25, 2022
2:19-CR-00351-VAP (C.D. Cal. May. 25, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-CR-00351-VAP

05-25-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON BREWINGTON, Defendant.


ORDER OF DETENTION

[FED. R. CRIM. P. 31.1(A)(6); 18 U.S.C. § 3143(A)(1)]

MARIA A. AUDERO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

I.

On May 25, 2022, Defendant Brandon Brewington (“Defendant”) appeared before the Court for initial appearance on the petition and warrant for revocation of supervised release issued in this matter, Case No. 2:19-CR-00351-VAP. The Court appointed Fermin Vargas of the Federal Public Defender's Office to represent Defendant.

II.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(a)(6) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a) following Defendant's arrest for alleged violation(s) of the terms of Defendant's [ ] probation / [X] supervised release, the Court finds that:

A. [X] Defendant submitted to the Government's Request for Detention;

B. [X] Defendant has not carried his burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he will appear for further proceedings as required if released [18 U.S.C. § 3142(b-c)]. This finding is based on:

• Unverified background;
• No bail resources;
• History of drug usage;
• Unstable residence.

D. [X] Defendant has not carried his burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he will not endanger the safety of any other person or the community if released [18 U.S.C. § 3142(b-c)]. This finding is based on:

• Association with street gang;
• Extensive criminal history that includes violence and firearms, including felon in possession of firearm and ammunition;
• History of drug usage;
• Refusal for drug treatment.

III.

In reaching this decision, the Court considered: (a) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a crime of violence, a Federal crime of terrorism, or involves a minor victim or a controlled substance, firearm, explosive, or destructive device; (b) the weight of evidence against the defendant; (c) the history and characteristics of the defendant; and (d) the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community. [18 U.S.C. § 3142(g).] The Court also considered the report and recommendation of the U.S. Pretrial Services Agency.

IV.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further proceedings.


Summaries of

United States v. Brewington

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 25, 2022
2:19-CR-00351-VAP (C.D. Cal. May. 25, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Brewington

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON BREWINGTON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 25, 2022

Citations

2:19-CR-00351-VAP (C.D. Cal. May. 25, 2022)