From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Brenizer

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Oct 1, 2021
File 20-cr-177 (ECT/HB) (D. Minn. Oct. 1, 2021)

Opinion

File 20-cr-177 (ECT/HB)

10-01-2021

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Kyle William Brenizer, aka Kyle Williams, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer issued a Report and Recommendation filed on August 9, 2021. ECF No. 96. No. party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 96] is ACCEPTED;

2. Defendant Kyle William Brenizer's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained by Search and Seizure [ECF No. 30] is DENIED in part and DENIED AS MOOT in part, as set forth fully in the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 96];

3. Defendant Kyle William Brenizer's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained by Search and Seizure (Cell Phone Evidence) [ECF No. 59] is DENIED; and

4. Defendant Kyle William Brenizer's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained by Search and Seizure (Vehicle Evidence) [ECF No. 60] is DENIED.


Summaries of

United States v. Brenizer

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Oct 1, 2021
File 20-cr-177 (ECT/HB) (D. Minn. Oct. 1, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Brenizer

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Kyle William Brenizer, aka Kyle…

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Oct 1, 2021

Citations

File 20-cr-177 (ECT/HB) (D. Minn. Oct. 1, 2021)